GODDESSES, IT'S TIME TO COME TOGETHER !
Home Invites Members Groups Events News Blogs Polls Forums Chat
Home > Blogs > Post Content

THE FEDERAL SCAM TO DESTROY FATHER-CHILD RELATIONSHIPS (976 hits)


Congress would feign admit its own dubious contribution to the suffering of America's children. Rather, these politicians promulgate the myth that they are helping children through federal and state welfare entitlement programs. It is, in fact, these very programs which are responsible for the out of control rampage against children. Here is how the scam works.

The federal government levies taxes against citizens to redistribute as welfare entitlements among needy applicants. Congress created the Social Security Act, a section of which is called Title IV. Title IV describes how tax dollars will be distributed among the States to subsidize their individual welfare programs. In order for States to tap into the federal treasure chest, containing billions of dollars, they must demonstrate that they are complying with Title IV mandates to collect child support revenues. In other words, to get money from the federal government, each State must become a child support collection and reporting agency.

Every unwed or single mother seeking welfare assistance must disclose on her application the identities of the fathers of her children and how much child support the fathers have been ordered by a family court to pay. She must also commit to continuously reporting the father's payments so that the State can count the money as "collected" to the federal government's Office of Child Support Enforcement. As with all bureaucracies, this process has developed into a monstrosity that chews up and spits out the very people it was designed to help.

States have huge financial incentives to increase the amount of child support it can report to the federal government as "collected". To increase collection efforts, States engage in the immoral practice of dividing children from their fathers in family courts. Have you ever wondered why family courts award custody to mothers in 80%-90% of all custody cases, even when the father is determined to be just as suitable a parent? It is because the amount of child support ordered by the State is largely determined by how much time the child spends with each parent. This means that the State "collects" less child support if parents share equal custody. By prohibiting fathers from having equal custody and time with their children, the State's child support coffers are increased and federal dollars are received.

Opponents try to paint loving fathers as "deadbeat dads" for daring to challenge the mother-take-all system of family law. This is nothing more than diversionary propaganda. The concern of fathers is not that they are unwilling to support their children financially. This is not an argument against paying child support. Any father that cares about his child will do everything in his power to provide for the child. The concern is, rather, that children are being separated from their fathers by family courts because the State stands to reap huge financial rewards as a result of the father's loss of custody. The higher the order of child support, the more money the State can collect - even if the amount ordered by the court far exceeds the reasonable needs of the child or if the father is required to take second and third jobs to keep up with outrageous support orders and escape certain incarceration. The truth is that most fathers don't care about the financial aspects of these family court verdicts nearly as much as they care about having their time with their children eliminated for nefarious government purposes.

The root of this evil is a State-level addiction to federal tax dollars being doled out as entitlement monies by a monolithic federal government. In the wake of this horror are millions of children drowning for lack of the care, guidance, and companionship of their fathers. Statistics and empirical evidence universally confirm that children forcibly separated from their fathers by family courts are considerably more likely to suffer anxiety and depression, develop drug addiction, engage in risky s*xual activity, break the law, and commit suicide. This travesty must end.

Unconstitutional federal bureaucracy creates many of the societal ills it claims to be trying to solve. There are several steps incremental steps that could be taken to restore a child's right to the companionship of both parents. For example, citizens should insist that States abide by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. No father should be automatically deprived of his fundamental right to the custody of his children without due process of law. Being a male is not a crime. Absent a finding of true danger from a parent, family courts should order shared parenting rights and equal time sharing for divorcing parents. These rights are fundamental and should not be abridged. The automatic presumption of custody-to-the-mother is unconstitutional.

The history of America is brim with examples of the federal government denying basic rights to its citizens. Women were denied the right to vote until the women's suffrage movement secured the 19th Amendment to the Constitution. Black Americans also were denied the right to vote and suffered myriad other cruel and humiliating indignities under the law until the civil rights movement brought about desegregation, put an end to Jim Crow legislation and compelled the enactment of the 15th and 24th Amendments to the Constitution. In each of these examples, society was slow to recognize that a problem even existed or that some of our laws were unjust. It took considerable time, concerted effort, self-sacrifice and perhaps even divine providence to realign concurrent societal paradigms with the principles of liberty and justice for all.

Our generation is not exempt from similar assaults on liberty. While many just causes may stake claims for redress of grievances, one group, more than any other, pleads for immediate support. The need to defend the rights of this group of American citizens, reeling from the unjust consequences of state-sponsored oppression, is before us. It is time to stand up for the rights of children and demand their equal access to both parents.
Posted By: Siebra Muhammad
Tuesday, October 19th 2010 at 9:39AM
You can also click here to view all posts by this author...

Report obscenity | post comment
Share |
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
Very interesting information, but can you provide a reference or link?
Tuesday, October 19th 2010 at 6:25PM
Jen Fad
You can read more here: http://www.nolanchart.com/article2699.html
Wednesday, October 20th 2010 at 4:13PM
Siebra Muhammad
/*
This is a very good posting, Siebra.

Speaking from the point of view of a man who has grown up in a Fatherless Home (Mother and Grandmother raised), I certainly can agree with the message and facts of this article. Fathers are forced to remain seperate from their children by way of the systematic and detrimental element forced on the very people it is suppossed to help. I feel for the ones who suffer the indignities of this type of interference.

Just look on any street corner...you will find the dudes hangin out have no respect for anyone! This is due to the fact that they never had to...try and talk to one of them - ("I aint got time for no ole head stories") They are taught to believe that their fathers don't give a hoot about them. Albeit, many cases have proven to be the case (fathers who just don't care - and continue to make baby after baby - the mothers' are at fault as well - "my baby's daddy" - the five other kids have different "baby's daddies").

The Fathers that sincerely care for their offspring are basically driven away from the responsibility for one reason or the other, (many times its the court system) - the mother is pissed with the father and denies the companionship - the parents of the mother don't approve of the father, etc.

One has to wonder about the psychie of the man who is forced to fork over money and be denied contact with the child he is to support. It goes on and on.

My father did have contact with my brothers and I, fortunately, even though my mother and he didn't get along...we basically had both parents - not under the same roof...the courts didn't have a damn thing to do with thier decision. So we did okay.

Anyway...very good report...and I agree with it.


Peace and Love,

Greg.
http://ezinearticles.com/?expert_bio=Grego...
http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/8140...
http://www.blogger.com/profile/10910946197...
http://www.BoulwareEnterprises.com
*/


Wednesday, October 20th 2010 at 5:38PM
Gregory V. Boulware, Esq.
this not only applies to fathers but also to mothers when they loose custody of their chldren as well....yes i do agree with it does happen to fathers more.
Thursday, October 21st 2010 at 11:05AM
pebbles peoples
I totally agree with you, that is why I blogged the article on THE FEDERAL SCAM TO DESTROY FATHER-CHILD RELATIONSHIPS. The folks that are labeling the NOI, The Black Panther Party, the NAACP and Color of Change as racist do not want especially to see a strong and viable black family, because this would detract from their message of the new family..defined as two "mothers" or two "fathers"... nothing against homos*xuals but these right wings may even imply that we can be raised by wolves..HOW LOW CAN YOU GO?
Saturday, October 23rd 2010 at 7:37PM
Siebra Muhammad
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
More From This Author
FUNDRAISER FOR WOMENHEART, THE NATIONAL COALITION FOR WOMEN WITH HEART DISEASE
WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN WHEN SOMEONE SAYS "I AM PRO-LIFE"?
NOTICE TO ALL SITE MEMBERS RE: TRUMP HAVING A STROKE
SUPPORTERS PACK CATHOLIC CHURCH TO HEAR FARRAKHAN SPEAK ON FACEBOOK BAN
JUDGE JUDY DELIVERS VERDICT ON DONALD TRUMP (HER REACTION MAY SURPRISE YOU)
STEPHON CLARK IS A 22 YR. OLD MUSLIM, HIS BODY WAS IN SUCH BAD SHAPE THE MOSQUE COULDN'T DO THE RITUAL WASHING
VIRGINIA CHURCH HANGS MANNEQUIN FROM A TREE
SIXTH GRADER WRITES WILL "JUST IN CASE" THERE'S A SHOOTING AT HIS SCHOOL
Forward This Blog Entry!
Blogs Home

(Advertise Here)